Daily
Current Affairs Analysis
14 May 2024
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UN-linked body defers accreditation of NHRC-India
for second year in a row
Related Topic (as per UPSC
Syllabus)
The headline "UN-linked body defers
accreditation of NHRC-India for second year in a row" indicates that a
body associated with the United Nations has postponed the approval of the
National Human Rights Commission of India’s accreditation for the second
consecutive year. This deferral could impact India’s role and influence within
certain United Nations frameworks, such as the Human Rights Council.
Relevance to the UPSC Syllabus
Topic: This news article is relevant to several areas of the
UPSC syllabus:
- Prelims:
Current events of national and international importance.
- Mains:
·
General Studies Paper II: Functions and responsibilities of the
Union and the States, issues and challenges pertaining to the federal
structure, devolution of powers and finances up to local levels and challenges
therein.
·
Subtopics:
·
Governance, transparency, and accountability.
·
Role of civil services in a democracy.
·
Important aspects of governance, transparency, and
accountability, e-governance- applications, models, successes, limitations, and
potential; citizens charters, transparency & accountability and
institutional and other measures.
Interview: Knowledge of human rights issues and
India's role in international organizations, demonstrating awareness of
governance and ethical issues in international relations.
News
Analysis
Overview of the Accreditation Deferral
·
The Global Alliance of National Human Rights
Institutions (GANHRI), based in Geneva, has deferred the accreditation of the
National Human Rights Commission of India (NHRC) for the second consecutive
year.
·
This decision, taken on May 1, during the Subcommittee
on Accreditation (SCA) meeting, involves representatives from New Zealand,
South Africa, Honduras, and Greece.
·
The deferral could impair India's voting capabilities
at the Human Rights Council and some UN General Assembly bodies.
Transparency and Appointment Concerns
·
The main concerns leading to the deferral relate to
transparency in NHRC's member appointments, particularly the inclusion of
police officers in human rights investigations and inadequate gender and
minority representation within the NHRC.
·
These issues were highlighted in the SCA's previous
reports, although the latest report has yet to be released.
Response from NHRC Officials
·
NHRC officials have indicated that the recommended
structural changes and suggestions from GANHRI were challenging to implement
during India's general election period.
·
They anticipate that the accreditation issue will be
revisited in future meetings scheduled for September or May of the following
year.
Historical Context of NHRC's Accreditation
·
The NHRC, established under the Protection of Human
Rights Act of 1993, has maintained an 'A' status since the onset of the
accreditation process in 1999, with re-accreditations in 2006, 2011, and a
restoration in 2017 following a previous deferral in 2016.
·
This marks the first instance of a consecutive
two-year suspension.
Civil Society Influence and SCA Submission
·
The deferral was influenced by submissions from civil
society organizations and human rights activists, who expressed concerns over
India's human rights record.
·
According to the SCA's six-point submission from March
2023, the NHRC has struggled to function independently of government
interference.
Issues of Pluralism and Representation
·
The GANHRI criticized the NHRC for lacking pluralism,
noting that its composition does not adequately reflect societal diversity.
·
The NHRC currently includes only one woman in its top
body and lacks representation from India's largest minority religions, although
it includes an ex-officio member from the National Commission for Minorities
and a member from the Jain minority.
Future Developments and Leadership Changes
·
With the tenure of the current chairperson, Justice
(Retd.) Arun Mishra, and member Rajeev Jain ending soon, there is anticipation
regarding how the new government, expected to be formed in early June
post-election, will address these vacancies and respond to the accreditation
challenges.
Probable Mains Question
Discuss the implications of the deferral of
NHRC-India's accreditation by the GANHRI on India's international human rights
commitments and its internal governance. (20 words)
Model
Answer ( Hints):
1. Introduction: The Global Alliance of National Human
Rights Institutions (GANHRI) has deferred the accreditation of the National
Human Rights Commission of India (NHRC) for the second consecutive year. This
decision highlights significant concerns regarding the autonomy and
effectiveness of NHRC in adhering to the Paris Principles, which are the
fundamental standards for national human rights institutions worldwide.
2. Demand of the Question: The deferral brings to light several critical
issues affecting NHRC, including the lack of transparency in appointments,
inadequate representation of gender and minorities, and the influence of
governmental policies on its functioning. This situation raises questions about
India's commitment to upholding international human rights standards and the
effectiveness of its institutions in safeguarding human rights within the
country. The impact of such a deferral extends beyond mere international
embarrassment and touches upon the core of India's governance and its adherence
to democratic values.
3. Way Forward: To address these challenges, there is an
urgent need for structural reforms within the NHRC to ensure greater
independence from governmental interference. Enhancing transparency in the
appointment process, ensuring the representation of diverse groups in its
composition, and strengthening the commission's powers to investigate and
address human rights violations are imperative steps. Additionally, fostering a
robust dialogue between the government, civil society, and international bodies
can help align NHRC's functions with global standards, thereby restoring its
credibility and accreditation status.
MCQs for Prelims Practice
The GANHRI is primarily concerned with:
A) Economic cooperation among countries.
B) Accreditation of national human rights
institutions.
C) Environmental protections.
D) Military alliances.
Answer: B) Accreditation of national human
rights institutions.
Explanation: The Global Alliance of
National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) reviews and accredits national
human rights institutions based on their compliance with the Paris Principles.
2. The NHRC was established under which
act?
A) India Penal Code
B) Protection of Human Rights Act
C) Constitution of India
D) Indian Civil Rights Act
Answer: B) Protection of Human Rights Act
Explanation: The NHRC was established under
the Protection of Human Rights Act of 1993 to promote and protect human rights
in India.
3. What does the deferral of NHRC's
accreditation imply?
A) Complete restructuring of NHRC.
B) Enhancement of NHRC’s powers.
C) Issues in NHRC’s compliance with
international standards.
D) Increase in NHRC's international
collaborations.
Answer: C) Issues in NHRC’s compliance with
international standards.
Explanation: The deferral indicates that
NHRC has not fully met the international standards necessary for accreditation,
such as independence and transparency.
4. Which principle governs the functioning
of national human rights institutions like NHRC?
A) Kyoto Protocol
B) Geneva Conventions
C) Paris Principles
D) Helsinki Accords
Answer: C) Paris Principles
Explanation: The Paris Principles set out
the international standards for the autonomy, independence, and
responsibilities of national human rights institutions.
5. Lack of what aspect was criticized in
the composition of the NHRC?
A) Financial expertise
B) Gender and minority representation
C) Legal expertise
D) Technological advancement


Comments on “UN-linked body defers accreditation of NHRC-India for second year in a row”