Daily Current Affairs Analysis
30 April 2024
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repolls
and Adjournments: EC's Options When Polling Process is Disrupted
Related Topic (as per UPSC
Syllabus)
Prelims Syllabus:
- Indian Polity and Governance: This topic includes various facets of the Constitution, political
system, Panchayati Raj, public policy, rights issues, etc.
Mains Syllabus:
- General Studies Paper II: Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice, and
International Relations
·
Subtopics:
·
Election and Representation: Covers the structure, organization, and
functioning of the Election Commission of India, electoral reforms, and related
issues.
·
Role of Institutions and Bodies Constituted for the
Protection and Betterment of Vulnerable Sections: In this case, the role of the ECI in
ensuring fair polling conditions.
Interview (Personality Test):
- Current Affairs: Candidates might be assessed on their understanding of current
electoral issues and the functioning of constitutional bodies like the
ECI.
News
Analysis
Introduction
The article focuses on the Electoral
Commission of India's (ECI) response mechanisms when disruptions occur during
the polling process. It explains the conditions under which repolls or
adjournments are deemed necessary, detailing various scenarios such as EVM
hijacking, booth capturing, and other unforeseen disruptions.
Detailed Analysis
1. Conditions for Repolls and Adjournments:
- Destruction
or Hijacking of EVMs: Repolls are ordered if there is any destruction or hijacking of
Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). These incidents must be severe enough
to compromise the integrity of the polling process.
- Booth
Capturing:
Defined under Section 135A of the RPA (Representation of the People Act,
1951), booth capturing involves unauthorized control over a polling
station to influence the outcome of the election. This can include voter
intimidation, forcibly preventing voters from entering polling stations,
or tampering with EVMs.
2. Specific Incidents Explained:
- Death
of a Candidate: If a
candidate dies, the poll in their constituency is adjourned. This is based
on the provision that if a recognized party's candidate dies, the election
for that seat is postponed to allow the party to nominate a new candidate.
- Unforeseen
Disruptions:
Situations like natural calamities (floods, severe storms), extreme
disruptions (large-scale riots, electronic failures at polling stations),
or any obstruction not caused by the candidates or parties, can lead to
either a delay in the start of polling or adjournment.
3. Legal and Procedural Framework:
- Under
Rule 49X of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961: This rule deals
with the non-commencement of the poll within two hours from the scheduled
time due to malfunctioning EVMs or any other valid reason, leading to an
adjournment of the poll.
- Reporting
and Decision Making: Any disruptions leading to an adjournment or repoll are reported
immediately to the ECI, which makes the final decision based on reports
from the ground, ensuring that the integrity and fairness of the election
are maintained.
Conclusion
The mechanisms and protocols set by the ECI
serve as crucial measures to ensure that the election process is fair, free
from coercion, and reflects the true will of the people. These measures also
emphasize the commitment to maintaining a democratic process, even in the face
of disruptions that could potentially skew election results. The ability to
adapt and respond to various emergencies underscores the robustness of India's
electoral system.
Probable Mains Question
"Analyze the implications of electoral
disruptions such as booth capturing and EVM tampering on the integrity of
Indian elections."
Model
Answer for UPSC Civil Services Mains Exam:
Introduction
Elections are the bedrock of a democratic
society, ensuring that governance remains responsive to the needs of its
citizens. However, electoral disruptions such as booth capturing and EVM
tampering pose serious challenges to the integrity of the electoral process
in India. These disruptions not only skew the electoral outcomes but also
undermine public confidence in the electoral process, thereby weakening the
democratic foundations of the nation.
Demand of the Question
The question demands an analysis of the implications
of electoral disruptions, specifically booth capturing and EVM tampering,
on the integrity and fairness of elections in India. It requires an examination
of:
- Impact
on Electoral Outcomes: How such practices can alter the true representation of voters'
will.
- Public
Trust in the Electoral System: The effect on citizens’ confidence in electoral processes and
democratic governance.
- Legal
and Administrative Framework: Evaluating the existing mechanisms in place to prevent such
disruptions and their effectiveness.
Way Forward
To combat electoral disruptions effectively
and restore public trust in the electoral system, several strategies need to be
adopted:
- Strengthening
Legal Frameworks: There
is a critical need to update electoral laws to incorporate stricter
penalties for booth capturing and EVM tampering. Laws must be made more
comprehensive to cover new methods of electoral fraud.
- Technological
Enhancements in Voting Machines: Enhancing the security features of EVMs, including the use of
advanced cryptographic techniques to ensure that the machines are
tamper-proof and the data remains secure.
- Voter
Education and Awareness Programs: Conducting extensive voter education programs to inform the
electorate about their rights and the importance of fair elections. These
programs should also educate voters on how to report discrepancies
observed during voting.
- Robust
Monitoring and Rapid Response Systems: Establishing a robust monitoring system that
includes CCTV surveillance of polling stations. Additionally, a rapid
response team should be ready to address any reports of electoral
disruptions instantly.
- International
Best Practices:
Learning from global best practices in electoral security can provide new
insights into improving the robustness of the electoral process in India.
Conclusion
Maintaining the sanctity of elections is
fundamental to the functioning of a democratic society. While disruptions like
booth capturing and EVM tampering present significant challenges, the
robustness of legal frameworks, advancements in technology, and increased
public awareness can significantly mitigate these issues. Ensuring the
integrity of elections will reinforce the democratic structure of India,
enhancing both governance quality and public trust in the electoral system.
MCQs for Prelims Practice
Question 1:
Which section of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 defines booth
capturing?
- A)
Section 123
- B)
Section 135A
- C)
Section 125
- D)
Section 100
Answer: B) Section
135A
Explanation: Section 135A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951,
specifically defines booth capturing, which includes taking control of a
polling station unlawfully to affect the outcome of the election.
Question 2:
What is the consequence of the death of a candidate from a recognized political
party during election process?
- A) The
election continues as scheduled
- B) The
election is postponed to allow nomination of a new candidate
- C) The
votes already cast are counted immediately
- D) The
election results are declared based on current standings
Answer: B) The
election is postponed to allow nomination of a new candidate
Explanation: According to Section 52 of the Representation of the People
Act, if a candidate from a recognized party dies, the polling for that seat is
adjourned to allow the party to nominate a new candidate.
Question 3:
Under what circumstances can a poll be adjourned due to EVM malfunctioning?
- A) EVM
malfunctioning after half of the votes have been cast
- B) EVM
malfunctioning before the poll has commenced and is not rectified within
two hours
- C) EVM
malfunctioning during the counting process
- D) EVM
malfunctioning but fixed within an hour
Answer: B) EVM
malfunctioning before the poll has commenced and is not rectified within two
hours
Explanation: Rule 49X of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 states that
if an EVM malfunctions before the commencement of the poll and is not rectified
within two hours, the poll must be adjourned.
Question 4:
Which of the following is NOT a method of dealing with electoral disruptions
according to the Election Commission?
- A)
Immediate repolling in the affected area
- B)
Declaration of election void if disruptions affect the outcome
- C)
Adjusting the voting hours
- D)
Ignoring minor disruptions
Answer: D) Ignoring
minor disruptions
Explanation: The Election Commission does not ignore minor disruptions;
all disruptions that could potentially affect the outcome of the election are
taken seriously, with measures such as repolling or adjusting voting times
implemented as needed.
Question 5:
What is the role of the Election Commission when a polling station experiences
a natural calamity on the election day?
- A)
Postpone the election indefinitely
- B)
Continue the election if at least half the voters have voted
- C)
Order repolling at a later date
- D)
Request military assistance to secure the polling station
Answer: C) Order
repolling at a later date
Explanation: In case of a natural calamity or other unforeseen
disruptions such as large-scale riots or technical failures at polling
stations, the Election Commission has the authority to order repolling at a
later date to ensure the fairness and integrity of the election process.



Comments on “Repolls and Adjournments: EC's Options When Polling Process is Disrupted”