Daily Current
Affairs Analysis- In Depth
29 April 2024
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't have basic knowledge about NHRC? Read Now
NHRC accreditation
status faces review test this week after being on hold in 2023
Related Topic (as per UPSC Syllabus)
- Prelims Syllabus Topics:
·
Current events of national and
international importance.
·
Indian Polity and Governance –
Constitution, Political System, Panchayati Raj, Public Policy, Rights Issues,
etc.
- Mains Syllabus Topics:
·
General Studies Paper II:
Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice and International relations.
·
Structure, organization, and
functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary—Ministries and Departments of
the Government; pressure groups and formal/informal associations and their role
in the Polity.
·
Statutory, regulatory, and
various quasi-judicial bodies including the role of NHRC.
·
General Studies Paper IV:
Ethics, Integrity, and Aptitude.
·
Human values - lessons from
the lives and teachings of great leaders, reformers, and administrators; role
of family, society, and educational institutions in inculcating values.
- Interview Syllabus:
·
The interview may assess the
candidates’ opinions on current issues affecting national and international
human rights policies and India’s role in this global arena.
News Analysis
Overview of
the Situation
The National
Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India is undergoing a critical review of its
accreditation status by the Global Alliance of National Human Rights
Institutions (GANHRI). This review could significantly impact India's influence
in human rights discourse at the United Nations (UN).
Background of
NHRC's Accreditation
- Initial Accreditation: The
NHRC was initially accredited in 1999 and received an 'A' rating, allowing
it full participation rights in the UN Human Rights Council and some other
UN bodies.
- Previous Status Holds: The
commission's 'A' rating was put on hold in 2023 due to concerns about its
compliance with the prescribed international standards for national human
rights institutions.
Critical
Assessment by GANHRI
- Failure to Meet Standards:
GANHRI’s Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA) has expressed concerns that
the NHRC has not created the necessary conditions to operate independently
and free of government interference.
- Involvement of Police Officers: The
NHRC's investigative process has been questioned due to the involvement of
police officers, which GANHRI sees as a conflict of interest.
Concerns Over
Minority Representation
- Lack of Diverse Committee Members: The
committee’s composition lacks members from India's largest minority
religions, which undermines the NHRC's credibility in representing the
diverse Indian demographic.
Potential
Consequences
- Risk of Downgrade: A
potential downgrade in its accreditation rating could limit the NHRC's
ability to participate and vote in certain UN bodies, thus diminishing
India's voice on human rights issues on an international platform.
Government’s
Diplomatic Efforts
- Ministry of External Affairs' Role: In
anticipation of the review, India's Ministry of External Affairs has been
proactively engaging with various countries to bolster the NHRC's case,
highlighting the nation’s human rights record despite external criticisms.
International
Perspective and Criticisms
- Rights Groups' Letter:
International human rights groups, including Amnesty International and
Human Rights Watch, have raised concerns over increasing restrictions and
discrimination in India.
- U.S. State Department's Report: The
U.S. State Department has cited "significant" human rights
issues in India, indicating a global perception of India’s deteriorating
human rights landscape.
Implications
for India
- Domestic and International Impact: The
outcome of this accreditation review is not just a reflection of the
NHRC's performance but also a signal to the international community about
India's commitment to upholding human rights.
Conclusion
and Way Forward
The impending
GANHRI review poses a substantial challenge for India's NHRC and its
international human rights engagements. Upholding the autonomy of the NHRC,
ensuring diverse representation, and addressing the conflict of interest
concerns are imperative steps for retaining the 'A' rating and, by extension,
India's robust participation in global human rights advocacy. The credibility
of NHRC and India's international standing as a promoter of human rights are at
stake, necessitating immediate and effective responses to the criticisms
leveled by GANHRI and international watchdogs.
Probable Mains Question
"Analyze the significance of NHRC's international accreditation
for India's human rights framework and its global image."
Model Answer for UPSC Civil Services Mains Exam:
Introduction
The
international accreditation of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)
serves as a barometer of India's human rights landscape and reflects the
country's image on the global stage. Accreditation by the Global Alliance of
National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) anchors the NHRC's reputation,
highlighting its autonomy, mandate, and adherence to the Paris Principles,
which include independence, pluralism, and wide competence in the field of
human rights. This accreditation is not merely a symbolic recognition; it is a
critical testimonial to India's commitment to upholding human rights standards,
which influences its diplomatic relations and positions on international
platforms such as the United Nations.
Demand of the
Question
The
significance of the NHRC's international accreditation can be unpacked through
a multi-dimensional analysis:
- Upholding International Standards:
Accreditation denotes compliance with the Paris Principles, signifying
that the NHRC operates free from government influence, with a diverse and
autonomous mandate. This compliance assures the international community of
India's dedication to human rights norms and its willingness to be
scrutinized under global standards.
- Impact on India's Global Image: In an
era where human rights are central to international diplomacy, the status
of NHRC influences perceptions of India's governance. A downgrade can
adversely affect its standing, whereas an 'A' status bolsters its role as
a global advocate for human rights.
- Domestic Implications:
Internationally recognized human rights practices reassure citizens of
their rights' protection and can empower civil society. They play a
significant role in fostering trust in the institutions responsible for
safeguarding these rights.
- International Relations and Foreign Policy: As
foreign policy becomes increasingly tied to human rights records, the
NHRC's accreditation status can directly influence India's bilateral and
multilateral engagements.
Way Forward
The NHRC's
journey towards regaining and maintaining its 'A' status accreditation requires
a concerted approach:
- Strengthening Institutional Autonomy: There
must be a clear delineation of the NHRC's autonomy from governmental
agencies to ensure decisions are made without external influence,
reinforcing its role as an impartial body.
- Ensuring Pluralism and Diversity:
Representation from all sections of Indian society, especially from
minority communities, must be prioritized to reflect a truly pluralistic
institution.
- Enhancing Transparency and Accountability: The
NHRC must strive for higher standards of transparency in its operations
and decision-making processes, making them accessible to public scrutiny.
- Engaging with International Human Rights
Discourse: Active participation in international human
rights dialogue and adherence to recommendations by global bodies should
be a constant endeavor.
- Fostering Public Awareness:
Educating the public about their rights and the NHRC’s role in protecting
them enhances the institution's relevance and accountability.
In
conclusion, the NHRC's international accreditation is pivotal to India's human
rights framework and global standing. The way forward demands robust reforms,
transparency, and a proactive engagement with global human rights mechanisms.
The pursuit to uphold the highest human rights standards must be relentless and
unwavering, ensuring that the principles of justice, liberty, equality, and
dignity enshrined in the Indian Constitution are not only preserved but are
also recognized internationally.
MCQs for Prelims Practice
1.
The NHRC's accreditation status is reviewed by which
international body?
A. United Nations Human Rights Council
B. Amnesty International
C. Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions
D. International Court of Justice
Answer: C. Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions
Explanation: The GANHRI is the body responsible for accrediting national
human rights institutions, which assesses their compliance with international
standards.
2.
Which principle is crucial for the accreditation of
national human rights institutions?
A. Conflict of Interest
B. Government Interference
C. Independence
D. Financial Stability
Answer: C. Independence
Explanation: Independence from government interference is a core
principle for the accreditation of national human rights institutions as per
the Paris Principles.
3.
The NHRC of India was first accredited in which year?
A. 1989
B. 1993
C. 1999
D. 2006
Answer: C. 1999
Explanation: The NHRC of India was first accredited in 1999 and has
since undergone periodic reviews to maintain its accreditation status.
4.
What was the outcome of the NHRC's rating in the year
2023?
A. It was upgraded
B. It was downgraded
C. It was put on hold
D. It remained the same
Answer: C. It was put on hold
Explanation: The NHRC's rating was put on hold in 2023 over concerns
about its compliance with international standards.
5.
The 'A' status of NHRC allows it to:
A. Implement laws in India
B. Participate and vote in the UN Human Rights Council
C. Accredit other national human rights institutions
D. Act as an advisory body to the International Court of Justice
Answer: B. Participate and vote in the UN Human Rights Council
Explanation: An 'A' status accreditation allows the NHRC to fully
participate and vote in the UN Human Rights Council and some other UN bodies.



Comments on “NHRC Faces Accreditation Review After 2023 Hold”